It's always "proof proof proof" with these people. Then when you bring them the proof, they look at ways to nick away at the authenticity and even the intentions of the whistleblower. We had a conversation not long ago regarding his financials which were downloaded from the Croatian government website. Some didn't even want to believe those.
So it's always "proof", as in Lloyd Evans going up on his channel with his passport opened to the picture page and saying, "Yes. I did indeed send that email to Dijana".
Ever notice that whatever Lloyd says doesn't have to be backed up by proof? They are "criminal defendants" he tells us! But he shows us no proof other than he filed a lawsuit against them. No proof of service, no proof that the Croatian court is actually pursuing this. He's broke but provides no proof to the patrons he manipulated other than his word. And as we can see and as his wife has told us, he is a habitual liar. And his balance sheet at the end of 2022 proves he's lying.
As a reminder, the "source" or one of them gave us this:
Take a good look at that picture and how fuzzy and pixilated it is. This came from DIJANA. Only other person who had access to it. Lloyd also confirmed it was real in a tweet. Looks to me that she took a pic from her phone of the iCloud pics which were loaded onto her computer.
So I think we can establish that Dijana leaked a lot of information, both verbal and tangible evidence to parties outside her marriage. That email is one such example. But sorry, we'll never get either party to ever come out and confirm it. We had the next closest thing - a known associate and confidant of Dijana who says it is genuine. Meaning of course that she has seen it and it indeed came from Dijana.